Question Of Congress At Work Example

Question Of Congress At Work Example Question Of Congress At Work – Coursework Example Political science The Watergate Affairs The Watergate affair is arguably the most controversial event in American history in terms of political affairs. It changed the perception of citizens to the presidency significantly. Named after the Watergate apartment and office complex where most of the scandalous activities occurred, the affairs had political twists that incriminated Nixon. Nixon resigned owing to certain impeachment evidenced by his illegally recorded tapes.Nixon was a mysterious man with many enemies. Regrettably, he used his presidential powers to get back at his adversaries, and later had to cover up his actions. Spying, interference, clampdown on civil liberties, and criminal acts make Nixon appear as a debauched person, which he was. Despite his efforts to clear his name, his actions betrayed any form of innocence from the public (Wood 3). The Watergate affairs demonstrate the unlawful measures that powerful people take to cover up their actions and maintain power. Ni xon faced considerable opposition and he needed to silence his adversaries to promote his political agendas. Public confidence is lost through such underhand tactics that politicians perpetrate. The whole process was largely unnecessary, especially the burglary, since Nixon had won the previous elections squarely. Nixon was unable to make any legislative progress because of the Democratic majorities in both congressional houses (Wood 2). There was a need to establish Republican majorities in both houses of Congress, hence the approval of the Watergate affairs. The cover-up is what triggered the downfall, and not the actual involvement. The imprisonment of his accomplices is not justifiable; even Nixon was supposed to be imprisoned. Investigative justice is necessary to uncover such scandals and measures that are more punitive should discourage impunity. Work CitedWood, Mike. Nixon’s Inevitable Road to Watergate: A Psychoanalysis Using the Path Dependent Model. California Stat e University Fullerton. President Richard M. Nixon Conference, April 27, 2012. Question Of Congress At Work Example Question Of Congress At Work – Coursework Example Task Iran Contra Affairs The Iran Contra affair was described as scandal that involved American hostages which were being held in Lebanon by a group which was associated to Iranian revolution. The secret dealing which were occurring between the American government with the military group resulted in the Americans being held hostage by the group. The funds generated from the sale of weapons to the military group were aimed at ensuring that the government provided funding for the Nicaragua contras. The government of United States hoped that the agreement to sale weapons would secure the release of the American hostages. This scandal can be described as to have escalated following the breakdown of diplomatic negotiations which were being conducted secretly. Undertaking the secret dealings in supplying weapons was assumed to enable the release of American citizens who were being held hostage in Lebanon (Sharpe, p22). The diplomatic breakdown between the involved groups contributed to t he tension which occurred and resulted in the development of the issues to a scandal. Some American government official were involved in the secret negotiation between the government and group, which can be considered an element of unethical political conduct. The authorisation of the sales of the weapons which was conducted in secret could have had significant influence in the development of the scandal. The element of secrecy in conducting the negotiations were fundamental in the political disconnection between the involved parties. The prohibition of funding for the contras, by the congress significantly contributed to the government seeking alternate source of funding. With the government lacking sufficient funding it became essential to deliver the contras funding regardless of the source of funds. The entire scandal can be described as resulting from negligence by the government in delivering some of the promises made to the citizens.ReferenceSharpe, Kenneth E. â€Å"The Rea l Cause of Irangate.† Foreign Policy 68 (1987): 19–41. Print.